Widor 5 toccata, Part II
(Continued from Part I)
There's a type of player who performs this piece in its entirety, from front to back, with a uniform legato touch, completely ignoring the accents and articulation marked in the score. They play it this way because this is the way they've always played it. It's also easier to play it that way because all you're doing is reading notes off a page and ignoring the articulation. Legato isn't what the composer had in mind when he took the time to place staccato dots (See blog, Touch, Part I) over the notes in the moving lines on the first page and mark all succeeding notes in the score "sempre staccato." Such notes are supposed to be played at exactly half their written value. Then again, Widor had the extremely wet acoustics of Saint-Sulpice in view, where notes and chords need to be detached more than written for the sake of clarity.
The left hand chord falling on each half note beat (photo) is marked in the score with an accent (>). This accent can be made using 2 different means: 1) by altering this chord's duration slightly, holding it very slightly longer, just long enough to be noticed by the ear, without a change in tempo (this type of accent is called an agogic accent), or 2) by holding the chord back a barely appreciable trifle before it's struck. The next left hand chord which follows, being marked staccato, is played on the beat and held exactly half its written value. These two left hand chords are then repeated on every succeeding half note beat, forming a series of repeating accented/staccato chord pairs throughout the rest of the piece. Each succeeding chord pair is executed exactly the same way. Care should be taken to observe these accents but not hold on to the first chord of each pair too long, which creates a marcato touch. Holding on too long on every half note beat this way runs the risk of making the listener "sea sick." The idea is to give the first chord of each pair a very subtle accent that's not noticed on the second chord, but with definite, audible separations between them. This automatically sets certain technical bounds to speed.
Some very capable organists have admitted that they've worked this piece for years and never could get past the first page (photo). Admittedly, this work on paper looks a little horrific with its torrent of black noteheads that never lets up from beginning to end through 10 daring pages. The secrets, if secrets they may be called, to developing a convincing interpretation and the requisite endurance for making one's way through this music are 1) first, start with a balanced bench position (see Balance in Organ Playing, I, II, III, What About Bench Position), 2) settle on a good starting tempo and how it will be nuanced (see Part I), 3) practice the staccato notes and chords very slowly at first (this may be done at the piano, always being careful to stop at the first sign of strain or fatigue), getting them to first sound at exactly half their written value (see Touch, I) before bringing the tempo up to speed, 4) raise and lower the wrists as you play to keep tension from setting in (see Touch, IV), and 5) develop flexibility in the bridge of the hand, which allows more finger movement from the knuckle down (see Touch, IV, Exercises, I). You'll have to work at it some, but this approach is the one that pays dividends. The organist who pays heed to these 5 things, and does them well, is on track to developing a very fine rendition of this famous work and can be expected to finish the last page fresh as a daisy without noticing the least fatigue.
There's a conspicuous stretch of a major 10th interval between middle C4 and E5 in the reiterated left hand chords on the last 2 quarter beats in measure 8, which is difficult even for players with average size hands to manage. In this passage we find a root position C7 chord written in open harmony. For some performers this stretch is impossible. One type of player solves this problem simply by moving the C4 up an octave to C5, thus keeping a 4 note C7 chord but changing it to a 2nd inversion chord in close harmony. This is the easiest and most common solution. Another type of player will play it exactly as written and assign the E5 to the right hand (thumb), changing the right hand fingering accordingly. This solution retains the original notation but requires a good bit of practice to coordinate the right hand acrobatics required to get a smooth result; the right hand fingering becomes a bit awkward, a great deal more difficult, and has little to recommend it.
Widor calls for diminuendos in certain places by closing the swell shoe. and these dynamic nuances should be observed. We sometimes observe that the final diminuendo beginning on measure 65 is ignored by the performer, as if the instrument for which Widor wrote had no enclosed division and only one manual, but this runs contrary to the composer's intention and the type of instrument he knew. Widor cleverly wrote this diminuendo into the music in order to widen the crescendo leading into the final chords. He realized that, for those final, crushing chords to have their greatest dynamic impact, they needed to be preceded by a noticeable reduction in volume. The way the composer notated this reduction was to assign the left hand part to a secondary enclosed division and to close the swell. We occasionally observe this entire piece performed on the Great manual with all manuals coupled and the left hand part on the last page taken on the manual below, rather than above, the right hand. This would be acceptable if the ear is telling us that the instrument's secondary manual divisions don't have quite the power or tone color that Widor had in mind. The crossed arms on the last page might also work better with the left hand below rather than above the right hand. Some practice on the instrument at hand will suggest which is best ["Once you can tie your arms into a pretzel and your legs into a knot, you've got the Toccata from Widor 5 under control." ]
The French builder Aristide Cavaille-Coll often included on his largest organs a Grand Orgue 16 subcoupler which, when drawn, lets every stop in the division speak an octave lower at the same time, thus doubling the number of speaking pipes in the main division ensemble and spreading the sonority over a much wider range of pitches [See blog, Listening For The Listener]. This device was made to be used sparingly and only in climactic passages where the largest spread chords were to be taken in the hands. Composers who wrote for this coupler were careful therefore to keep most of the notes in these spread chords from going below middle C4, since considerable 32-foot tone was generated with 16-foot stops drawn. To get something of the same effect on Anglo-American organs which happen to lack this coupler the left hand notes in the coda can, with good artistic conscience, be expanded to include a wider reach downward (by a note or two) to create a richer, more massive sound. Those organists with long, slender fingers who can span an interval of a 10th easily enough will find themselves blessed in this regard.
These considerations, and there are others, should be sufficient to show that this music, obviously, cannot be interpreted with a Baroque mind set. The composer of the Art of Fugue would be among the first to promote the idea that interpreters at the organ need to train themselves to approach the entire repertoire with interest, being mindful to adapt one's playing to all existing styles of music. Sebastian Bach, even in his maturity, made detailed copies of all good organ music he could get his hands on, regardless of country of origin, and made it his business to learn how it was to be peformed. He happened to be forced, through an accident of birth, to wander through the closing years of the 17th century and the first half of the 18th century. What resulted, in his case, beginning around 1700, was fifty years of white hot creativity. This, as it turned out, was most fortuitous because it gave the world, among other things, the finest organ fugues in existence. And, it's probably safe to conclude that there are certain pieces of his that he would not have conceived any differently if he were acquainted with modern organs.
But, if this man had lived a century and a half later, it's no stretch to say that Bach the organist, with his almost superhuman invention, would have developed his touch at the piano rather than the clavichord (see Touch, Part II), would have written some of the most beautiful Romantic organ music imaginable, and would have performed this music idiomatically, i.e. consistent with the prevailing practices of the time. Bach the total musician would have been an avid exponent of the 19th century orchestral organ and the additional possibilities it presents. He would be among the first to say that just because another organ is built in a different style from previous centuries does not mean that it's inferior in any way. He'd also be among the first to admit that shining Romantic organ music through a Baroque prism can create just as much aberration as Romanticizing Baroque organ music.